December 30, 2020 — As the COVID-19 pandemic emerged, trauma centers faced unprecedented obstacles to providing care for injured patients. A look at steps taken by trauma centers in response to COVID-19 is provided by a survey in the January/February Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), the peer-reviewed journal of the National Association for Healthcare Quality (NAHQ). The journal is published in the Lippincott portfolio by Wolters Kluwer.
Trauma centers introduced new processes to optimize use of personal protective equipment (PPE), ICU beds, ventilators, and other limited resources, according to the report by David Bar-Or, MD, of ION Research, Englewood, Colo., and colleagues. «This information will be of value as trauma centers continue to respond and adapt to the pandemic, focusing on meeting the need for critical trauma services while protecting the health of trauma care teams,» Dr. Bar-Or comments.
New processes to provide care at U.S. trauma centers, despite scarce resources
As the pandemic took hold in the spring of 2020, hospitals struggled to provide care not only for patients with COVID-19, but also for other groups of patients in need of care that couldn’t be delayed. While the American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma provided initial guidance on maintaining trauma center access, it was up to individual trauma centers to work out detailed processes for providing patient care.
«Trauma centers have a unique situation in that admissions for traumatic injuries are not scheduled and therefore cannot be cancelled or postponed,» Dr. Bar-Or and colleagues point out. «Accordingly, they must prepare for an influx of patients with acute respiratory symptoms and continue care for patients with traumatic injuries.»
To gain insights into how they met these challenges, Dr. Bar-Or and colleagues surveyed directors of six level I trauma centers in four states: Colorado, Kansas, Missouri, and Texas. The responses provided insights into changes in key areas, including:
- N-95 respirators. Trauma centers faced shortages of essential N-95 respirator masks. Four of the six trauma centers surveyed reported reusing respirators after employing various methods of sanitization or sterilization. At some centers, trauma team members received only one mask per day or per week.
- PPE. Most trauma centers clustered patient contacts, with the aim of minimizing need for personal protective equipment (masks, gowns, respirators, etc). Four hospitals increased PPE use for all patients on arrival, while two provided PPE to symptomatic patients. One hospital had to request PPE from local government due to regional shortages.
- ICU beds. Five hospitals added ICU beds, while three designated a specific ICU for COVID-19 patients. All hospitals isolated COVID-19 patients in negative pressure rooms. In some cases, rooms or entire floors were converted to negative pressure.
- Mechanical ventilation. Two trauma centers created ventilator allocation protocols. Three centers reported daily tracking of ventilator use, while three requested additional ventilators in anticipation of a surge. The trauma centers reported varying changes to intubation protocols, and in the use of noninvasive ventilation approaches (CPAP or BiPAP).
The survey was conducted in the latter half of May 2020, as U.S. Coronavirus deaths passed the 100,000 mark. At that time, none of the trauma centers had experienced an overwhelming surge of COVID-19 patients. «This could be due to the actions taken to allow for additional treatment beds,» the researchers write.
The survey provides a snapshot of how trauma teams and hospitals met the need for essential trauma care through the first months of the Coronavirus crisis. «This study summarized the processes that participating trauma centers developed to protect the trauma patient and trauma care providers while providing optimal trauma care for patients—without specific guidance from professional organizations,» Dr. Bar-Or and colleagues conclude. «This was possible even when faced with scarce resources.»
Click here to read «Processes for Trauma Care at Six Level I Trauma Centers During the COVID-19 Pandemic.»
About the Journal for Healthcare Quality
The Journal for Healthcare Quality (JHQ), a peer-reviewed journal, is an official publication of the National Association for Healthcare Quality. (NAHQ). JHQ is a professional forum that continuously advances healthcare quality practice in diverse and changing environments, and is the first choice for creative and scientific solutions in the pursuit of healthcare quality. The Journal publishes scholarly articles that are targeted to leaders of all healthcare settings, leveraging applied research and producing practical, timely and impactful evidence in healthcare system transformation.
NAHQ is the leader in healthcare quality competencies. NAHQ provides a strategic advantage to healthcare professionals and the organizations they serve by developing and evolving competencies in healthcare quality that result in better patient and financial outcomes to support the goals of healthcare value. NAHQ offers the industry standard certification in healthcare quality, extensive educational programming, networking opportunities, and career resources to help healthcare professionals meet the challenges they face. Learn more about NAHQ at nahq.org.
About Wolters Kluwer
Wolters Kluwer (WKL) is a global leader in professional information, software solutions, and services for the clinicians, nurses, accountants, lawyers, and tax, finance, audit, risk, compliance, and regulatory sectors. We help our customers make critical decisions every day by providing expert solutions that combine deep domain knowledge with advanced technology and services.
Wolters Kluwer reported 2019 annual revenues of €4.6 billion. The group serves customers in over 180 countries, maintains operations in over 40 countries, and employs approximately 19,000 people worldwide. The company is headquartered in Alphen aan den Rijn, the Netherlands.
Wolters Kluwer provides trusted clinical technology and evidence-based solutions that engage clinicians, patients, researchers and students with advanced clinical decision support, learning and research and clinical intelligence. For more information about our solutions, visit https:/
Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.