Bottom Line: A risk prediction model that combined genetic and clinical factors with circulating biomarkers identified people at significantly higher than normal risk of pancreatic cancer.
Journal in Which the Study was Published: Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, a journal of the American Association for Cancer Research
Author: Peter Kraft, PhD, professor of epidemiology at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health in Boston.
Background: “Pancreatic cancer is a particularly deadly cancer, with about 80 percent of patients diagnosed with advanced, incurable disease,” said Kraft. “Catching it at an earlier stage makes it more likely that surgery will be an option, increasing the chances of survival.”
Kraft explained that existing screening techniques, such a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), are not recommended for the general public because they may generate excessive rates of false positives. They are most appropriate for people at higher risk of pancreatic cancer, and therefore, improving identification of the high-risk population could improve tailored prevention and screening efforts, he said.
Risk factors for pancreatic cancer include family history, chronic conditions like diabetes and pancreatitis, and smoking. Kraft said prospective studies have shown that certain circulating biomarkers tied to insulin resistance have also been shown to influence risk. “These factors have been investigated individually, and in this study, we wanted to examine the combined effect of clinical factors, common genetic predisposition variants, and circulating biomarkers.”
How the Study was Conducted:
The study examined data from four large prospective cohort studies: the Health Professionals Follow-up Study; the Nurses’ Health Study; the Physicians’ Health Study; and the Women’s Health Initiative. They analyzed data from 500 patients diagnosed with primary pancreatic adenocarcinoma between 1984 and 2010, as well as 1,091 matched controls. The study enrolled only U.S. non-Hispanic white participants, because genomic risk variants have been confirmed in the white population but not in other groups, Kraft said.
The researchers collected data on lifestyle and clinical characteristics from patient questionnaires; blood samples; and genomic DNA from peripheral blood leukocytes of the participants. They calculated a weighted genetic risk score based on data from two large genome-wide association studies.
The researchers developed three relative risk models for men and women separately. One featured only clinical factors; one added the weighted genetic risk score to the clinical factors; and the third added biomarkers proinsulin, adiponectin, IL-6, and total branched-chain amino acids.
Results: Kraft said that each new level of data improved “model fit,” allowing for more accurate identification of pancreatic cancer risk.
Ultimately, the models identified subsets of participants who were at three-fold or higher increased risk of pancreatic cancer than the general population. The model that featured only clinical characteristics identified 0.2 percent of men and 1.5 percent of women who were at three-fold or higher increased risk. The model that combined clinical and genetic factors identified 0.3 percent of men and 2.3 percent of women at three-fold or greater risk. The model that added weighted genetic risk score and circulating biomarkers identified 1.8 percent of men and 0.7 percent of women who were at three-fold or higher increased risk. The final integrated model identified 2.0 percent of men and 2.3 percent of women who had at least three times greater than average risk in 10 years of follow-up. The individuals in the top 1 percent of risk carried a 4 percent lifetime risk of pancreatic cancer.
Author’s Comments: While this model would have to be confirmed and studied in other populations, Kraft said the study indicates that combining biomarkers with clinical and genetic factors can result in better identification of the people who could benefit from screening and early detection of pancreatic cancer.
“Like most cancers, pancreatic cancer is multifactorial,” Kraft said. “The more we are able to combine information from multiple domains, the better we will become at identifying those who could benefit from screening.”
Study Limitations: The study’s key limitation is that family history of pancreatic cancer was not collected from most participants, making it difficult to estimate the relative risk of this important factor. The impact of smoking status also could not be directly estimated, as the contributing studies matched patients with pancreatic cancer to cancer-free individuals based on their smoking status.
###
Funding & Disclosures: This study was funded by grants from the National Institutes of Health; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Hale Family Center for Pancreatic Cancer Research; Lustgarten Foundation; Stand Up To Cancer; Pancreatic Cancer Action Network; Noble Effort Fund; Promises for Purple; and the Broman Fund for Pancreatic Cancer Research. Kraft declares no conflicts of interest.
About the American Association for Cancer Research
Founded in 1907, the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) is the world’s first and largest professional organization dedicated to advancing cancer research and its mission to prevent and cure cancer. AACR membership includes 47,000 laboratory, translational, and clinical researchers; population scientists; other health care professionals; and patient advocates residing in 127 countries. The AACR marshals the full spectrum of expertise of the cancer community to accelerate progress in the prevention, biology, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer by annually convening more than 30 conferences and educational workshops, the largest of which is the AACR Annual Meeting with more than 22,500 attendees. In addition, the AACR publishes nine prestigious, peer-reviewed scientific journals and a magazine for cancer survivors, patients, and their caregivers. The AACR funds meritorious research directly as well as in cooperation with numerous cancer organizations. As the Scientific Partner of Stand Up To Cancer, the AACR provides expert peer review, grants administration, and scientific oversight of team science and individual investigator grants in cancer research that have the potential for near-term patient benefit. The AACR actively communicates with legislators and other policymakers about the value of cancer research and related biomedical science in saving lives from cancer. For more information about the AACR, visit //www.
Disclaimer: AAAS and EurekAlert! are not responsible for the accuracy of news releases posted to EurekAlert! by contributing institutions or for the use of any information through the EurekAlert system.
